The three common exits
Selling the property
The most direct exit is selling the security property, or another property the borrower owns, and using the net proceeds to discharge the loan. Bridging loans, residual stock loans and many construction facilities lean on a sale. The questions that matter are price and timing. What will the property realistically fetch once commission, marketing, legal costs and any GST are deducted? How long will it take to list, find a buyer, exchange contracts and reach settlement? Buyer demand and the buyer's own lender sit outside your control.
Refinancing to a longer-term lender
A refinance exit replaces the short-term facility with a longer one, often from a bank or a mainstream non-bank lender. It suits borrowers who want to keep the asset, such as an owner who has finished a renovation and wants an ordinary home loan, or an investor who has leased a commercial building and can now show rent.
The weakness is that a refinance depends on someone else's credit decision. The incoming lender applies its own policy, instructs its own valuer and makes its own assessment of income and serviceability. If you could not pass those tests today, you need a concrete reason why you will pass them by the time the current loan expires.
Selling down part of the security
A sell-down sits between the other two. A developer might sell some completed units and refinance the remainder, or sell one lot of a subdivision and hold the rest. A commercial owner might sell a share to a co-owner. The partial sale reduces the debt to a level a longer-term lender will accept, or that the borrower can carry comfortably.
Sell-downs need careful sequencing. Lenders usually set a release price for each lot or unit, which is the minimum sum that must reach the lender before it discharges its mortgage over that part. Ask how release prices are calculated before you sign, and check that each planned sale will clear them.